ВХОД ДЛЯ ПАЦИЕНТОВ
вверх
поиск
админ
главная
исходное
|
Re: ortho classifications
послал Alexander Chelnokov 24 Сентябрь 2004, 23:58
|
R> please let me know, how often different orthopaedic classifications are used
R> in your practice.
I wouldn't expect definitive answers like "I use 47 ones - the list is below..."
R> However, when one glances at, say, Rockwood's _Fractures, or Wheeless'
R> Textbook of Orthopaedics, it is easy to see a lot of
R> "unconventional" classifications by various authors.
And often with description of the classiciations or at least a reference.
R> It's sometimes a problem, when you come across some classification,
R> mentioned in an article, and should crawl through a chain of journals to find the
R> source.
It is an example of what the Internet ortho community can be useful for. You and other colleagues may remember cases of such requests and prompt detailed replies.
R> It would be nice to have them (classifications) all in one handy volume.
Great idea! I would offer to start it as an on-line project - it is most rapid and transparent environment allowing to attract more contributing volunteers.
|
| Послать ответ |
Обратите внимание: Поля с жирными названиями обязательны.
Старайтесь отвечать в рамках обсуждаемой темы, а не начинать новые обсуждения.
Указывайте адекватную тему сообщения, чтобы было ясно, о чем оно.
Не послайте сообщений не по теме (оффтопик), раздраженных, грубых или обидных комментариев. Здесь это неуместно.
|
