AOTRAUMA.ORG Центр Илизарова  

Ортопедия и травматология Общие вопросы/General questions Help Информационные технологии в медицине
 вверх
 отправить
 поиск
 админ
 главная
 Предыдущее
 Весь тред


Re: Severely comminuted Trochenteric #
Alexander Chelnokov 29 Январь 2006, 00:18
GT> Whether one uses the DCS or a proximal femoral nail, the entry site for the
GT> lag screw is fractured so the lateral side hold of the screw is poor.

For Gamma it means nothing.

GT> I would still use the DCS.

It is much more demanding surgery than closed nailing through 1-2 cm incisions.

GT> Reason: familiarity with the device! But certainly the nail would
GT> be equally good (or bad!)

Nail would be definitely better - small wound, safe immediate weight-bearing...
  • Сообщения о Ортопедия и травматология
  • Также Alexander Chelnokov
  • Связаться с автором
  • Ответить

    Re: Severely comminuted Trochenteric #
    George Thomas 29 Январь 2006, 00:23
    Where is the proof that the nail permits earlier weight bearing. About the small incision, I agree.
    [ Ответить ]

    • Re: Severely comminuted Trochenteric #
      Отправитель: Alexander Chelnokov 29 Январь 2006, 00:24

      Gamma, PFN and relative nails were developed for that, i.e. immediate weight-bearing in fractures of proximal femur in elderly with osteoporosis.

      [ Ответить ]
      • Re: Severely comminuted Trochenteric #
        Отправитель: George Thomas 29 Январь 2006, 00:30
        That is what the manufacturers say, but is it the fact? No offence intended, but are there any studies to show that this is really true?

        [ Ответить ]
        • Re: Severely comminuted Trochenteric #
          Отправитель: Alexander Chelnokov 29 Январь 2006, 00:35
          GT> That is what the manufacturers say, but is it the fact? No offence
          GT> intended, but are there any studies to show that this is really true?

          Our current practice daily confirms that. Though of course many studies do. Some citations:
          =========================
          Pelet S, Arlettaz Y, Chevalley F. Osteosynthesis of per- and subtrochanteric fractures by blade plate versus gamma nail. A randomized prospective study. Swiss Surg. 2001;7(3):126-33
          [...]
          CONCLUSION: We prefer Gamma nail in per- and subtrochanteric femoral fractures management, it allows early and fast weight-bearing and fracture healing is acquired in all cases.
          =========================

          =========================
          Sehat K, Baker RP, Pattison G, Price R, Harries WJ, Chesser TJ. The use of the long gamma nail in proximal femoral fractures. Injury. 2005
          Nov;36(11):1350-4.

          [...] The long gamma nail allowed early weight bearing...
          =========================

          =========================
          Moholkar K, Mohan R, Grigoris P. The Long Gamma Nail for stabilisation of existing and impending pathological fractures of the femur: an analysis of 48 cases. Acta Orthop Belg. 2004 Oct;70(5):429-34.
          [...]
          The Long Gamma nail offers the advantage of a technically less demanding percutaneous insertion through the tip of the greater trochanter, secure proximal femoral fixation and the ability to allow immediate or early weight-bearing ambulation...
          =========================

          [ Ответить ]

     

    ( Ответить )

    Powered by Zope  Squishdot Powered MedLink
    Посетитель: 0067472
      "По форме правильно, а по существу - издевательство" В.И.Ленин
    ©2001-2019Orthoforum Coordinator.
    [ Главная | Отправить сообщение | Поиск | Админ ]